News, Sports & Entertainment, Publications Sales

Archives for: September 2009

The Media versus the Media Bank Fees Post

Over 12 months ago I wrote this article regarding bank fees that they were too high for all these bail outs. The News Media yahoo.com abcnews today did a report on bank fee's and the report was something similar to what happened to me with B of A. I find that the News channels are late on information that I had already investigated and pointed out. The information was out there over a year ago before the bail outs were occurring. This is one reason why the bail outs occurred because the banks showed the government about there charges people did which caused people to overdraw.
But oddly some of these outlets I applied for employment to. This post is edited and in my book the State of the Union 2
ref

National Election/National Economy a National Editorial by www.Jamestowncalif.com

The 700 Billion Dollar Bailout Plan
The 700 Billion Dollar Bailout plan proposed by the Executive and Legislative Branches fell short of the needed votes to pass Monday. The New Proposal all of a sudden has become the National News overshadowing even the Election. Monday, the Stock Market collapsed for its largest point loss in history declining 777.69 points, the 16th largest percentage wise in history. The Blame game is what is going on now amongst the Congressional leaders and President Bush on why this bill is so important for the economy. The Congressional leaders are at their lowest using fear tactics in language on the media spots as we all are witnessing the leaders scramble and sell this ridiculous number for the Bailouts.
Recently AIG was Bailed out as the government approved billions of dollars moneys for the Insurance Company. Freddie Mac Bank and Fannie Mae Banks just recently got approved moneys in the billions for a bail out. Washington Mutual is now gone, and the switch to Chase are all factors of Bank Failures. Each Bank have their own failures. While some Banks recently bought other banks like Wachovia taking over World Savings, it is now more apparent that there is a deeper crisis or issue happening here during the later part of the Bush 2nd Term. Right Before leaving office, all these proposals are back tracking spent moneys from policies taken. At the same time, right at the end of the 2nd Term, one should question why now, rather than a year ago?
It started when the U.S. Administration approved a 1 billion dollar package for Georgia after Russia attacked or invaded the Country. Then the Proposals all came for Banks, Insurance, Agendas, and while the Economy is struggling to recover, this is the worst possible thing to have happened for ordinary working people. People have suffered through these tough times. Some People have had to endure the mere fact that government played a factor in one’s losing jobs by intervening so much in the private sector when the Public Sectors duty and job position is to preserve the Constitution first.
Former President Truman is infamous for saying that "the Buck Stop here". What do you think he meant or what do you think that could have meant down the line? Deficit Spending is what it sounds like as perhaps the statement of the Buck Stop Here means from his position that all moneys and revenues made the prior year will not be squandered away by spending more money than bringing in while at the same time providing a savings account or a profit. That would mean No National Debt if other Presidents respected the peoples money through the generations by not over and over deficit spending, or worse spending more money than needed during a War Time.
Former President John F. Kennedy was famous for his statement: “It’s not what your Country can do for you, but what you can do for your Country”. We are educated to believe that statement after the knowledge that at the time the President of the United States was killed November 1963, and are to mean for all of us to Contribute and serve the Country because the Commander and Chief also serves. In that time, the Vietnam War started right after JFK’s Presidency. I believe, and have always kept those words, that speech in mind while we are taught that JFK was one of the Greatest Presidents by his Character and what he was trying to do. The government at that time in all agencies was changing and has been pretty much influential still today. At the same time, I think it is important to also keep in mind that it works visa versa meaning, it is what your country can do for you when it is the tax revenues from employment and investment making the highest percentage of the contributions for the moneys to circulate for the taxes to be used for spending for the national economy. It is what your country can do for you by staying off your back rather than be on you all the time. The Economy Today is at a ridiculous phase, and it should have never reached this point. It is what you can do for your Country, and it is important that the Country does not attack you economically or physically.
Monday September 29, 2008, the Stock Market took its biggest point plunge in history 777.69 points. Tuesday, the Market gained 485.21. Investors are actually antsy and anxious of the government proposed bail out. People Today bought stocks for cheaper than they would have Monday. People are in crisis, and some are in panic because of all the bank failures happening all at once while the Cash Flow is stagnant. People don’t sell stocks often times because they want to but because they have to just like when one is put in the situation of having to sell your house or property.
So we ask ourselves, how did the economy get to this point where the economy is so bad? The government has not been talking about the raise in gasoline past 4 dollars now at 3.50 which effects productivity. The high price of fuel most of all effects costs to maintain a business, your employers business, and it affects your own expenses if you have to drive to work 30 minutes or more.
The Banks, the Media, and the leaders have put a lot of blame on the consumers, and the homeowners for the Mortgage Crisis and decline. The failing loans, the ARM loans, the raising of interest loans have accumulated to be too costly for some folks and there are a record number of foreclosures this year. In Southern California’s Riverside and San Bernardino Counties, there was a 280% percent increase of foreclosures. Many People lost there homes because they lost there jobs. When you have to find work and go out, it costs for gasoline, and when the price goes up it is tough for so many people. People oftentimes have to choose between fuel or del taco. People that have there jobs in Orange or Los Angeles Counties have to drive 25 dollars worth or more a day. If you own your business and drive, then all gas increases affect owns ability to maintain other bills.
The Mortgage Crisis is one of the main reasons why the Government is proposing the 700 billion dollars to bail out the banks for the faulty loans. The President continues to reiterate how urgent it is for the economy to get this bill pass. Some of the things that are in the bill have not been debated, and some congressional leaders voted yes with some not reading all the paperwork. It is absurd the level of deceit going on with Congressional Leaders and the Executive Branch as they are trying to sell another plan after all the selling they have done that got us all into this mess in the first place. But it was all well calculated, and there is some kind of working together these institutions and the government as they have swindled all the money they can each person, all 280 million of us.
The Homeowner continues to get the most blame for the mortgage crisis and excuse why the Banks are in need for so much money, each one. But there are two ways to look at this situation before blaming the customer. The Customer when he had money was taken advantage of with the way terms were written on the agreements of the loans to buy the home. Sometimes the homeowner doesn’t have good credit, so he pays the extra point, sometimes pays two points so that in two years he can refinance. This is the time when the bank calculated the ARM loans for them to make money, but for the consumer to bust in 5 years on that adjustable. Don’t forget the taxes. On a property at 500,000, your taxes are at 6000.00. Stay in the home for 10 years that is 60000, so when the government boots your out of your house or job, they don’t take that into consideration. They only consider when they need or want the money, and are not concerned about you. In fact, the bank makes money no matter how you look at it. The Mortgage business was a good market and business to be in from 2001-2006. Now the government wants a piece of that monopoly by being the one’s first to bail out certain banks, and second to provide loans to homes that are seized or foreclosed. It is economic warfare going on locally, but the congress leaders don’t take people into consideration when coming up with such hideous proposals.
Say you have a 300,000 loan, and you put down 30,000 to get the loan. If you refinanced with an ARM loan, that adjustable goes up each year, and by the fifth year, the payment would go from a 3000 to 4300 or more. If you pay 3000 a month times 12 months that is 36000 per year you are giving to the bank. In 5 years 36000 each year would be 180000. The Evil is in the Interest and how the Banks double dip each property based on calculating first how people tend to move, work, and immigrate to the U.S. cities. So You have paid 180,000 in 5 years on a 300,000 loan, but don’t owe 120,000, you owe more than the principle because of the way the banks structured the loan basically punishing you for your credit history no matter how you look at it. Now the Congressional leaders want to bail out the banks. There is no homeowner bailout out proposal even attached to this bill. To add what is not being presented is how the bank is the one at fault, and why should the tax payer pay for the bank failure? The Bank collects a good percentage of money for each property although the house is foreclosed. The Bank took the risk by giving these loans when they knew the loans were cheating their customers. Rather than giving homeowners a fair fixed 5% loan, the banks swayed and gave the other loans. They also had their representative sign for those loans, and get paid on those loans. Knowing that the loans could bust the customer, the Bank chose to give it to him anyways knowing that it was in a way cheating. So why does the tax payer have to bail out the banks on the Mortgage Crisis for the faulty loans that they underwrote? One thing that sticks out, the banks gave out some of those loans with the attitude that it didn’t matter almost like they knew they could be reimbursed or bought out by another bank. While people are in terms of one loan with one bank, notices come in all the time to pay for taxes when due when sometimes the bank presented the loan with taxes included when they were not included giving the IRS a reason to bother you. Flat out Cheating people out of money when people were making money before the gas increases came. Looking back the ARM loan the first year was interest only and reduced to where there was some cash flow going into the economy by one thinking he is saving on his house payment when it is only for the first year.
There are other factors that the Congressional leaders and President are not talking about on reasons why they want this bill passed, and passed so soon without much debate.
Is Bank of America Committing Fraud? In My Opinion, Bank of America is committing some sort of Cheat with their customers on how customers are able to use and spend money. Fraud is a tough word, and you decide. A lot of people bank with Bank of America. Recently I had a bad experience with B of A after I discovered my Checking account was Overdrawn 343.00. It became overdrawn first at 168.00 and while I disputed the charges, 4 thirty-five dollar fees, by Monday I received more fees. What B of A does is get you on your charges with the ATM/Credit Card. A lot of people don’t ever bounce a check and would automatically blame the person who bounces a check or uses the card with no money in it. It is always easy to blame the customer. However, what I noticed, is that some ATM charges are not automatically taken out of the account when used. I also noticed that I was able to get 20.00 from the ATM Machine at the bank, use the card for small purchases like buying coffee when I had a certain balance. But if one check comes in and it bounces, rather than charging for the one fee on that check, the bank is back tracking all the prior purchases and uses of the card while there was money in the card. The bank does not stop the card when it gets overdrawn, nor does it properly always notify the customer of an overdraw. But the points of sale that were used when money was in are being charged also when a check comes in and bounces, all the uses are being charged the 35.00 fee. To add, when you buy gas at Shell, the Station is not right away taking the funds out. Some stations first approve for a 1, then approve it again.
Don’t bounce a check, or don’t use the card flat out. But for the many people that this happened to, the end result is while the bank is taking fees money, that money could be and should be going out into the economy. A 1.95 Starbucks Coffee, a Coke for 1.11 at Wall Mart cost me 35 dollars each after one item came in to overdraw the account, the bank back tracks the points of sale. So if you had money on Friday, you may still not be able to use it because if you do and a check bounces, all the uses are being charged. I pleaded and argued my case to the Bank of America Representatives, but they all seemed that they didn’t care. They showed no concern when I said that I can no longer bank with B of A because the way the Bank is charging me to use my money it is costing me more on fees than on bills. 43.00 cost me 343.00. The blame goes to me for banking with Bank of America I thought. When I went to another bank to open an account, I noticed that other banks are also charging these fees on charges of the use of the card.
Most people will bounce a check once a month, but that should be one fee for that check. But the trick is in the card. It poses as an ATM meaning Automatically transferred. Instead it is taking 3 days or more sometimes to clear certain items. So if Star Bucks is taking too long to get paid from B of A, I can’t go to Star Bucks if it is going to cost me 35 dollars because of their machines. Same thing goes for Wall Mart. Shell is a Gas Station, and funds should be transferred automatically. The Bank Rep will mention the card use as a Visa or Credit. But in fact it is not a Visa, nor a Credit card because if anything is paid, your not getting an end of the month statement. Your still getting a 35.00 charge even if you used it when there was positive funds, but something comes in, or takes a while to clear, the other charges are being back tracked, and fees are added. Too many fees. And these are big companies machines that are not automatically transferring the funds. Imagine if you’re an employer, and one check bounces, then the other checks bounce. So if your boss tells you not to cash your check on Thursday just because you got it to wait till Friday there is a reason.
The Iraq War, and the fact that the Iraq Government is buying equipment from private companies while it is the Public's money that has supported the War. The Iraq War has exceeded 700 billion dollars, and by granting 700 billion dollars, it could be the reimbursement of those funds. Rather than being Reimbursed by Iraq’s government for providing duty and security that is not what is happening. It is almost like paying twice. 6 years of the Iraq War, and the mission is still not defined while Presidential Candidates continue to use the Wars Progress as a platform for why you should vote for him. Both Presidential Candidates have had their campaigns affected after President Bush Summoned both of them. It is a diversion, and it hurts Obama because the Democratic Party are such weasels the way they are asking for the money. Senator Dodd has a lot of nerve going up there asking for the money and votes while he received the sweet heart deals for a home loan. All the leaders have a lot of nerve especially Republican Leader Boehner blaming the house or representatives for not passing the bill Monday.
John McCain did not even invite the Governor of California to the Republican Convention. The Governor was faced with the California State Budget crisis that later passed for a 143 billion dollars. The Budget for the State was 143 billion, and the President and Congress want 700 billion dollars to bail out Banks.
Hurricane Katrina sure could have used such quick response and money, but those people were just not considered as important as the banks, CEO's, and private interests lobbyists. 200 Billion would get the city back in order. New Orleans was one of those Port Cities that Dubai Ports World wanted after 9-11-01 before the Hurricane. The President and Congress has not been wise with the funds generated from revenues and taxes.
I think that 100 billion dollars-200 billion dollars should be the most going out in case there is a bail out in my opinion. Anything that this President Proposes should be questioned when the media should have already made there case for the people for impeachment based on the Iraq War lure and WMD’s. What if there was another war and we needed the money to finance ourselves. What if World War 3 happened at our doorstep and that 700 billion was needed for that rather than for this. All the factors are leading to the same denominator, and that is the government is becoming more and more socialist, and communist while there is another war taking place, in on it through their agencies, neglecting the people, and economically attacking them through government policies, war, and the spending of tax funds through deficit spending.
Ironically before the Iraq War, President Bush didn’t really need Congress. There were many times looking back that Congress influence meant nothing. But when Funds are needed, the President is nice to Congress. He was not that nice to the Congress before the Iraq War, but during the War, it has been the opposite. And the disgust of the Democratic Congressional leaders all working hand and hand with the President is also showing that what led up to this point, and what got us all here all looks more and more blatant and deliberate by the day. Everything these leaders say sounds dishonest, and the American People now see through these leaders based from their own experiences. The 280 million U.S. citizens have been neglected in everything, and the money was always there, but now it is not. Not one of those 700 billion has been proposed to get people health insurance. So if you are ill and have no insurance, there is nothing for you. But for the Banks and CEO’s that willingly knew that they are doing some sort of cheating, they would not have tried to get away with it, if they didn’t know they have some kind of back up. And like a Criminal, they are trying to cover their tracks. It is no coincidence that all these bank failures are all happening now, and the foreclosures and short sales are a percentage of the missing money from the mortgage crisis, but there are other reasons why the government leaders are trying so hard to pass this bill.
Then who would print the money, and off what paper. Canadian Paper is what is being used more now for news papers, giveaway slips, and could be used for even money. This proposal is solely to get more tax revenues and cash flow out into the economy for specifically going to certain interest groups in my opinion. If this bill passes for anything more than half, it will be a media failure and if socialism is what our government is becoming then what point is it to tune into the media news stations.
www.jamestowncalif.com www.jamestownjupiter.com www.jamestowncalifornia.wordpress.com www.myspace.com/jamestowncalifornia
Update: The 700 Billion Dollar Bill was passed by the Senate and the House, and Friday was signed by President Bush. The Congressional leaders added other parts of the bill that had nothing to do with the needed funding for the bank and wall street bailout. There were no compromises and no reductions on the amount, and the full amount was agreed. To Think if you gave each person all 280 million U.S. Citizens a million dollars, that would account better for the economy rather the moneys going to the special interests, bank bailouts, and the tax payer is paying for it on a new credit card. I think the media really was disappointing being diverted by the elections more so than this bailout. I think bank fees, bounced checks, and unfair bank practices are reasons why there is this scam going on, and instead of lowering, reducing or taking off the fees, the banks just got bailed out and in another words rewarded. These practices by the government leaders with the private sector have made the U.S. Economy a socialist one. Welcome to the Soviet Union, we live in it, and that is what the truth is. The journalists more like broadcasters have yet to point that out.

13 feedbacks

Senate Panel Votes a “No” on Public Option What does that Mean? National Economy/National Editorial 12 by www.jamestowncalif.com 9-29-09

09/29/09 06:30:45 pm

Aerospace News

Senate Panel Votes a “No” on Public Option What does that Mean? National Economy/National Editorial 12 by www.jamestowncalif.com 9-29-09
Tuesday the Senate Panel Voted a “No” on the Public Option Plan. The Health Care Insurance Bills so far have shown a certain bias. According to last weeks latimes.com report, there is nothing in that bill that is going to control costs. To add, Medicare faces a 240 billion dollar reduction according to the Baucus Bill. What does this all Mean? How does it affect people and how does it affect the National Economy, and what about the State’s Economy?
“It’s my job to put together a Bill that gets 60 Votes” said Baucus (ref msn.com report). Max Baucus is the Montana Democrat whom is the Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee. The President has stated that he wants the bill at a 900 billion dollar budget over the next 10 years. Some Independent groups have it at over a trillion.
It’s a policy where the Government Option is competing against Business and the Senate is the Middleman or in the middle making the votes while the bills are drawn up. Many leaders in the recently elected class of 2006 and 2008 have been very harsh on their words and assessment on those people against some of these bills. It is already known that many leaders consistently don’t read the paperwork before voting, so does that mean is that vote valid? (Something I pointed out in my book the State of the Union 2 (http://search.barnesandnoble.com/bookSearch/isbnInquiry.asp?r=1&ISBN=0595515452&r=1
http://www.amazon.com/State-Union-Socialist-America-Versus/dp/0595515452/ref=sr_1_13?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1228182636&sr=8-13
http://search.barnesandnoble.com/bookSearch/isbnInquiry.asp?r=1&ISBN=0595515452&r=1
* Available as: * Published: December, 2008 NEW RELEASE 2009
* Format: Perfect Bound Softcover
* Pages: 540
* Size: 6x9 * ISBN: 9780595515455
http://www.iuniverse.com/Bookstore/BookDetail.aspx?BookId=SKU-000069146
Buy This Book Perfect Bound Softcover Price: $31.95 http://jamestowncalifornia.wordpress.com
ORDER ONLINE THROUGH THE BARNESANDNOBLE.COM WEBSITE THANK YOU
www.Jamestowncalif.com Presents The State of the Union 2 New Book Release)
It seems that the Congressional Leaders are desperate for getting a bill together no matter how much it costs, and no matter how it affects business and the economy. It is a true fact that the fact that this debate is even going on is because of two reasons. Reason number one is because the costs are high for care currently. The second reason is because the insurance companies continue to charge a lot on their policies, and sometimes they play tricks with the customer by dropping them sometimes, or fighting over the cost of the care with the doctor or hospital. To add when the hospital knows that either the State insurance or private insurance is going to pay for it, they raise costs on medications, care, and visits. The reforms are needed, but not in the fashion that I have noticed from what the Public Option is which was voted down today in the Senate.
The popular sang: “is the government option going to be able to pull the plug on grandma” is something the American People are concerned about. The American People rightful are standing up for their rights by debating this issue. The leaders are calling some meetings as Mob-like, and that is not right. Many people are happy with their insurance, and happy with what they have. Those people have played it by the rules over a course of time without changing that course and now the leaders want that disrupted.
The leaders say that a public option will not affect private insurance, but I disagree. It seems as if Washington wants the bill to be able to control the Health Care Industry State by State, and get people into their system. What will that do to the deficit in 10 years adding 900 billion-1 trillion dollars into that new system? It's like giving them a reason to print more money, then tax it, then pay interest on it while this system doesn’t control costs. Some leaders have said that the Bill will control costs, but according to the latimes report Thursday last week, there was nothing showing that it will control costs. In fact costs can go up if the doctors and hospitals know that the government is going to pay for it. That will also mean that every person has the likely to be directed into care that they would not otherwise need. At the same time there have been reports that if you don’t have insurance you’re going to pay up 3800-4000 penalty for not having insurance. For every penalty or tax on people for not having insurance that money otherwise goes to the local & state economy.
It's like shoving it in your face and standing there telling people what are you going to do about it? It is unbelievable the newly elected leaders urge to borrow as much money as possible for all bills. Can there be a possible fraud that is going on?
I think that with all this information going around about what the groups have put together, it seems as if this is more about controlling the industry itself. There needs to be insurance reform I think. This can be the time when the economy flourishes by private insurance companies giving better deals on policies for people to afford. Instead, there has been nothing I have noticed by the insurance companies to give policies at lower costs. It is a tough economy, but in order to make the economy better you need to get competition in industries. This is a golden opportunity for the economy to get a boost of money, but so far it has not happened. The insurance company needs to do more to give incentives for people to buy policies that there is no need for a public option, nor the debate. Its is the excuse the leaders use knowing that its not health care reform we need, its insurance reform, and costs reform in hospitals and care that need some reform. And the big one, the giving people of medications, the costs of those drugs, who is going to pay for it. Right now they are already expensive, and I think too expensive, and that is what has not been addressed where the leaders are more keen borrowing another 1 trillion dollars to pay for a Health Care Reform Bill.
What happens if that money runs out? What will happen to the private insurance industry and the people whom make their living on selling insurance if there is a government option? Some argue that it is a government take over of the health care industry, is that a fair assessment? The first thing that will happen is that people will lose their jobs in the private insurance industry. People would quit if they were unable to sell insurance at the rate they have been or if the government option is less by even a few bucks. That is why the insurance companies need to do more. Those people that will not sell insurance anymore will have a gap in employment thus there is tax money that is lost from his income, then from what he owns say property. Taxes in the state level can be lost if a lot of people are put out of work over a bill that can change the way business is done from a private to a public economy.
Some of the leaders have acted in an aggressive stature on this issue. Some leaders have insulted people directly in the town hall meetings. I thought the B Frank comment to that lady:”What planet are you on” went to far. I also question where some of the leaders get their information and if they are intentionally either incompetent to running a National Economy or are deliberately trying to hurt people which ends up hurting the National Economy. Some of the news I have seen the last 2 weeks, I have never seen such bad news, and the economy is worse that it was last year at this time. The economy is the same only that there is more deficit spending, and that is what needs to be addressed. The private economy circulates and pays for itself. The public option can eventually go broke, just like everyone else has without a bail out. I think that the leaders seem desperate on getting a bill together then to vote on it as Baucus suggests he only cares about getting the 60 votes.
I think its remarkable all these commercials about trying to sell this health care reform when its more than that. “No American Should go broke because they get sick President Obama Says. He’s right in that commercial. However the leaders putting the bills together so far it has shown that first costs will not be controlled, and second there will be reductions in Medicare, and those are two big factors that people know that is not making sense in all this. Why do you want to cut Medicare, and why the Bill that has been put together has not addressed costs.
New York News, making it mandatory those workers that are in the health care industry have to take a H1N1 flu shot. There was some protests today on that new measure. Socialist Medicine is already trying to get through the barriers it seems now in New York creating a law for people that are doctors or working in the industry all having to take the shot. Some people may quit or not go to work over this. Its something that you wonder well how did the virus create up in the first place.
How is the Public Option going to create competition as Senator Shumar suggests saying that "We need a Bill"? What if it devastates the whole industries itself both the health care industry and the insurance industry? And what about the taxes that people generate from employment what happens to those taxes if people lose their jobs over these reforms that the tax payer is going to be paying for anyways the way the bills are structured right now?
And what about Cures for diseases, couldn't that 900 billion be used wiser, and does any of that money proposed do anything to get a cure for a disease?
thank you
The State of the Union 3 12
www.jamestowncalif.com all rights reserved

Send feedback

NFL Week 3: Michael Vick Ready to Play Again in the NFL 3

09/27/09 01:56:55 am

Late Night Entertainment Show 4 http://www.youtube.com/jamestownncarolina

http://www.fannation.com/blogs/post/452340-michael-vick-ready-to-play-again-in-the-nfl-3-week-3

Michael Vick Ready to play in the NFL, the most anticipated comeback in football in quite some time Week 3 if your the Eagles Coaching Staff, do you start him versus Kansas City? Do you start Michael Vick this 27th of Sept. at home versus the Chiefs? Currently from Wednesday USATODAY Newspaper under match ups NFL lines have the Eagles a 9.5 point favorite against the 0-2 KC Chiefs. The Chiefs have allowed 51 points against while scoring 34. The Eagles go into Week 3 without Donavan McNabb from his injury week one and have scored 60 points and allowed 58 points.

This is a big game for the Eagles at 1-1 with the NY Giants at 2-0 going into Sundays Game versus Tampa Bay, a road game for the Giants. Dallas is at 1-1 plays Monday Night hosting Carolina. Washington is 1-1 plays at Detroit Sunday. This is a pivotal week for the Eagles to compete against the other teams in the NFC East, and with Vick available this week, do you start him?

Week 2 McNabbs replacement K Kolb was second for yards in stats with 391 yards passing although the Eagles were defeated 48-22 to the new NFC powerhouse New Orleans Saints. Kolb on those 391 passing yards had 2 TD's, and threw for 3 Int's. It is good to know that Kolb is a capable QB. The question is Sunday do you start Michael Vick?

I think its a good opportunity to insert Michael Vick into the line up for the Eagles. I d like to see what he can do out there early in the season. It is going to be interesting to see if the coaching staff inserts him as a second string QB going in for plays. I think starting him is a good option, and the fans will get to see how the Eagles coaching staff handle the fact that Michael Vick is ready to play again in the NFL?

This is his week. No matter how you look at it, Vick has not played in the NFL since 06. The sooner you get him into the line up and swing of things, the better it is to see how the player investment pays off. This is the golden opportunity for Vick in that he is actually needed right now the fact that McNabb is suffering from a rib injury. You don't want to insert McNabb to soon, and this is a good moment to see how Michael Vick can swing 4 or 5 games in a row and most importantly produce wins. He is going to produce ratings, but that is not what the coaching staff is looking at although the networks are, and many fans of football are.

Some good games week Three. The Bengals/Steelers game seems to be the game of the day Week 3. But the attention is going to be on the Chiefs/Eagles game to see how Michael Vick comes into the game or if he doesn't play at all. Michael Vick is ready to play again in the NFL Week 3, and this is a good week of football for him to make his comeback in my opinion.

"START EM"?

http://www.fannation.com/blogs/post/452340-michael-vick-ready-to-play-again-in-the-nfl-3-week-3

Update Eagles win 34-14. Kolb gets the start. Vicks comes in for a few plays during the game.

Send feedback